|
The U.S. House of Representatives (lower house) passed late
last year House Resolution 2420 (Mutual Funds Integrity and
Fee Transparency Act) which would require a study on soft
dollars and ban managers from jointly running mutual and hedge
funds. A similar bill, Senate 1971 (Mutual Fund Investor Confidence
Restoration Act), has been introduced in the U.S. Senate (upper
house). The Senate bill would also ban the joint management
of mutual and hedge funds. Besides the management ban and
soft dollar regulation, both bills are more focused on the
mutual fund industry than regulating hedge funds.
Even if com prise legislation passes becomes public law in
the U.S. this year, it is unlikely to have a major impact
on the Asian hedge fund industry. Most of the long only products
run by Asian hedge fund managers are not registered in the
U.S. and thus unaffected by the potential U.S. legislation.
For the moment the U.S. Congress has let the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) take the lead in any potential hedge
fund regulation. The SEC Chairman William Donaldson has spoken
about requiring U.S. based hedge funds to register with the
SEC, however he has yet to garner the support of the other
Republican appointed SEC Commissioners or the Federal Reserve
Chairman Alan Greenspan. There has also been discussions regarding
the role prime brokers play in capital introduction, but the
SEC has yet to implement any regulations.
As hedge fund scrutiny has intensified in Washington, DC,
the Hong Kong government is taking steps to clarify its position
on exempting off-shore funds, including hedge funds, from
paying profit tax in the city state (although the specific
proposals have recently come under criticism from various
industry sectors).
|