Search
Eurekahedge - Other Products and Services
Fund Of Private Equity Fund Database Free Trial

Hedge Fund News

EH Report

Manager Interviews

‘Mizuho-Eurekahedge Index’ goes live

Asian Hedge Fund Awards

Industry Events Calendar

Fund Launches and Closures

Archive



Eurekahedge
Eurekahedge Hedge Fund Indices
Hedge Fund Monthly

Challenges in Commodities Risk Management
By Hilary Till, Joseph Eagleeye
Co-founders of Premia Capital Management LLC
December 2005


The recent outperformance of commodities versus equities has caused a positive re-evaluation of commodities by both retail and institutional investors. Since December 2001, the annualised performance of commodities as represented by the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI) has been +26.2% while the annualised performance of equities as represented by the S&P 500 equity index has been +3.8%. See Figure 1.

Figure 1

Data Source: The Bloomberg.

The positive performance of the GSCI has largely been due to the following two factors: (1) adverse supply shocks resulting from the aging energy infrastructure in the US and Europe, and (2) expanding demand, particularly from China. These factors may well continue to boost the returns from investing in a commodity futures programme.

As discussed in Till and Gunzberg (2005), if an investor elects to invest in a commodity index product, then that investor realises that he or she will earn the inherent return of the asset class, will be able to do so cheaply, but will not be provided with any downside risk protection. It will be the responsibility of the investor to either time their investments in commodity indices, or create a properly balanced overall portfolio, so as to avoid downside risk.

Instead, if the investor chooses an actively managed commodity programme, then that investor expects the potential downside of this investment to be carefully managed.

Risk Premia Strategies

Some active programmes obtain their returns through the careful exploitation of time-varying risk premia in the commodity markets. For example, Figure 2 illustrates an active portfolio's exposure to various commodity sectors and fixed income during the first eight months of 2004.

Figure 2
Exposures to Time-Varying Risk Premia in the Commodity Markets


Click on the graph for enlarged preview

This graph illustrates Premia Capital's rolling exposures in energies, metals, US fixed income, livestock, and agriculture during the first eight months of 2004. More technically, the graph shows the conventional benchmarks that were most effective in jointly explaining Premia's daily return variance using an advanced returns-based-analysis technique.

The benchmarks are the Goldman Sachs (GS) Commodity sector excess return (ER) indices and a Bloomberg US fixed-income index. The graph's y-axis is the fraction of R-squared that can be attributed to a benchmark exposure. This is also known as the benchmark's variance component. The middle chart shows each benchmark's contribution to R-squared over the whole history. Source: PRISM ANALYTICS, http://www.prismanalytics.com.

Source: Till (2005).

We have found that the most important element in an investment programme that exploits the risk premia available in the commodity futures markets is its risk management methodology. In the interests of brevity, we will focus on only one aspect of risk management: the avoidance of inadvertent concentration risk.

Avoidance of Inadvertent Concentration Risk

Ideally a commodity portfolio manager will attempt to create a portfolio of diversified commodity strategies in order to dampen risk. According to hedge fund manager Paul Touradji, "One of the best things about being a commodity manager is the natural internal diversification." "While even unrelated equities have a beta to the overall market, many commodities, such as sugar and aluminum, traditionally have no correlation at all," according to Teague (2004) in his interview with Touradji.

Seasonally Varying Correlations Due to the Weather

One might expect that the price of natural gas should not be correlated to the prices of either corn or hogs. But in reviewing Figures 3, 4, and 5 from the summers of 1999, 2001, and 2005, one might question that expectation.


Figure 3

Panel A

Panel B

Data Source: The Bloomberg.

Figure 4

Data Source: The Bloomberg.


Figure 5

Data Source: The Bloomberg.

It turns out that the prices of natural gas, corn, and hogs all depend on the outcome of weather in the US Midwest during the summer. An exceptional heat-wave in the Midwest can impair corn pollination prospects as well as stress the delivery of adequate natural gas supplies for peak air-conditioning demand. Also, the delivery of hogs to market can be curtailed during heat-waves because the animals may get too stressed during transit. Because each of these commodity markets have common reactions to the possibility of extreme heat, their prices tend to wax and wane at similar times during the summer.

If a commodity portfolio manager does not want to own too much risk to the outcome of summer Midwest weather, then it would be prudent for the manager to examine how the portfolio would do during times of both extreme and normal weather during the US summer, especially if the portfolio includes natural gas, corn and hogs.

Seasonally Varying Correlations Due to Chinese Holidays

One might expect that the price of crude oil should not be correlated to the prices of either soybeans or copper. But in reviewing Figures 6 and 7 from this past spring, one might question that expectation.

Figure 6

Panel A

Panel B

Data Source: The Bloomberg.

Source: Till (2005).

Figure 7

Panel A

Panel B

Data Source: The Bloomberg.


What might explain the common waxing and waning of prices in crude oil, soybeans and copper during this past spring? As Figure 8 summarises, China is now the number 1 or 2 consumer in a number of major commodities. When one re-examines Figures 6 and 7 in light of the Chinese holiday calendar, one notes that the lulls in each commodity's bull market have occurred around the time of Chinese holidays in February and May of this year, presumably when Chinese demand was absent.


Figure 8

Impact of Chinese Demand: The Macro View

  • 1.3 billion people

  • World's No.1 consumer of copper

  • World's No.1 consumer of steel

  • World's No.1 consumer of iron ore

  • World's No.1 consumer of soybeans

  • World's No.2 consumer of energy

  • 50% of the world's cranes are in China.

Source: Howell (2005).

If a commodity portfolio manager does not want to own too much risk to fluctuating Chinese demand, then it would be prudent for the manager to be careful in his or her risk capital allocation to the petroleum complex, industrial metals and soybeans.

Cautionary Note on Chinese Demand

In April 2004, following reports of a more stringent official policy towards industrial loans in China, both copper and platinum prices declined precipitously, as shown in Figure 9.

Figure 9
Platinum and Copper Prices During the Last Half of April 2004


Data Source: The Bloomberg.
Source: Till and Eagleeye (2005).

Copper and platinum became the same trade during the latter half of April of 2004. If a manager had both of these trades in his or her portfolio, then that manager may have inadvertently doubled up on risk to China's intensive economic development.

The entrée of China as a dominant force in the commodity markets obviously has a number of implications for an active manager's risk-management and portfolio-construction methodologies. One consequence may be to view the world in terms of internationally-traded commodities versus purely domestically-traded commodities. A basket of internationally-traded commodities includes, for example, crude, copper, and soybeans while the diversifying basket of (US) domestically-traded commodities includes livestock and natural gas. The "domestic" basket would be expected to perform independently of the "international" basket, and presumably the performance of the "domestic" basket would not be impaired by a Chinese economic hard-landing. In that scenario, we might expect the "international" basket to potentially perform poorly as its components have thus far benefited from strong Chinese demand.

That said, taking into consideration the risk of a Chinese economic hard-landing is not meant to invalidate the case for commodity investing. We are only recognising that the history of developing economies is one of violent, unpredictable fluctuations around a long-term growth trend (such as occurred in the US during the 19th Century) so one might expect similar patterns during the ongoing development of China.

Conclusion

We conclude by noting that while the commodity markets provide a manager with ample opportunities for creating portfolios of diverse strategies, there are a number of challenges in doing so. In this article, we provide two examples of those challenges: (1) the correlations amongst commodities vary seasonally due to meaningful weather events, and (2) the entrée of China as a dominant force in the commodity markets has created new correlation footprints. The main implication of these observations is that risk management in the commodity markets is a very dynamic process.

 

A version of this article was previously published in the Fall 2005 issue of Commodities Now, http://www.commodities-now.com.

The authors wish to thank Galina Kalcheva for assistance in risk management research.

Chicago-based Premia Capital employs statistical techniques to detect opportunities in derivatives markets across asset classes. Premia Capital's focus, though, is on the (natural resources) commodity futures markets. The principals of Premia Capital also advise large investment firms on sophisticated risk-management techniques in periodic consulting engagements. http://www.premiacap.com.

References

Howell, Robert, Investment Seminar, Schroders Alternative Investments Group, Commodities, Gstaad, February 2005.

Teague, Solomon, "The Commodities 'Gladiator'," Risk Magazine, June 2004, p. 88.

Till, Hilary, "Risk Management in Commodity Futures Trading," Presentation at GAIM 2005 Conference, Lausanne, June 2005.

Till, Hilary and Joseph Eagleeye, "Commodities - Active Strategies for Enhanced Return," a chapter in the The Handbook of Inflation Hedging Investments (Edited by Robert Greer) McGraw Hill, Forthcoming 2005; and an article in The Journal of Wealth Management, Fall 2005, pp. 42-61.

Till, Hilary and Jodie Gunzberg, "Absolute Returns in Commodity (Natural Resource) Futures Investments," a chapter in Hedge Fund Investment Management (Edited by Izzy Nelken) Elsevier, Forthcoming 2005.

If you have any comments about or contributions to make to this newsletter, please email advisor@eurekahedge.com

[Top]




 
Industry News
 
     
  The Eurekahedge Report - August 2014  
     
  Asset Flows Update for the Month of July 2014  
     
  Hedge Fund Performance Commentary for the Month of July 2014  
     
  2014 Key Trends in Global Hedge Funds  
     
  The Billion Dollar Interview with Quantedge  
     
  Hedge Funds: All Eyes on the World Cup (and Reinsurance)  
     
  Reporting Red Tape - Australia's Superannuation Reporting Requirements  
     
  Shariah Compliant Funds Seek a Safe Haven in Brazilís Free Trade Zones  
     
  Widening the Scope: the SEC Turns Its Attention to Alternative Mutual Funds  
     
Eurekahedge Hedge Fund Manager Travel Plans

Copyright © 2014 Eurekahedge Pte Ltd.
Use of this site is subject to our terms and conditions of use.