|
The number of venture capital companies (VCC)
totalled six in 1990 and rose to 13 by 1992. The
number of VCC almost doubled to 23 by end of 1998,
but it was not until 1999, that the pace of venture
capital development significantly accelerated
with the launch of MSC Ventures, which was allocated
a fund of US$31 million.
In 2001, US$131 million was allocated to Malaysia
Venture Capital Management for information and
communication technology (ICT) investments and
in 2002, US$20 million was allocated to MIMOS,
a government-owned, research and development (R&D)
organisation specialising in the areas of ICT
and microelectronics, and US$50 million to Kumpulan
Modal Perdana, a government-owned company to administer
and manage the venture capital for Technology
Acquisition Fund. In the 2003 Budget, a further
US$260 million was announced for non-ICT investments.
Historically Malaysia's venture capital industry
was dominated by local venture capital players
and lagged behind developed countries like Japan,
Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Korea. However,
in the past two to three years, the emergence
of independent venture capital firms in Malaysia
marked another significant development in the
market. In the past, a majority of the VCC were
either government- or bank-owned and in almost
all cases, have chosen to manage their own funds
rather than outsourcing to professional fund management
companies.
Current Developments
Further expansion was recorded in 2004, in terms
of the total size of funds, total investments
from both local and foreign sources, number of
venture capital fund management companies and
number of investee companies.
Figure 1: Key Statistics on the Venture Capital
Industry
| |
|
As at end 2003
|
As at end 2004 |
| Venture
capital funds (US$m) |
557.4 |
596.3 |
| Total investment
(US$m)* |
231.2 |
278.4 |
| |
Local sources
(US$m) |
202.4 |
233.6 |
| |
Foreign
sources (US$m) |
28.8 |
44.8 |
| |
|
|
|
| No. of venture
capital companies/funds |
43** |
38 |
| No. of
venture capital fund management companies |
31 |
34 |
| No. of investee
companies |
31 |
34 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
During 2003 |
During 2004 |
| Total investment
(US$m) |
59.9 |
76.2 |
| |
Local sources
(US$m) |
50.7 |
65.4 |
| |
Foreign
sources (US$m) |
9.2 |
10.8 |
| |
|
|
|
| No. of
investee companies |
115 |
139 |
| |
|
|
|
| * Including
divestment activities ** Based on Bank Negara
Malaysia's definition |
| Source:
Securities Commission |
The government remains as the major source of
provider of funds. The contribution of funds for
VC investments coming from domestic private sector
entities recorded a significant increase of 35.1%
in 2004. Funds received from foreign sources have
also increased substantially to US$44.8 million.
Figure 2: Sources of Venture
Capital
(% share, as at end 2004)
Total US$596.3 million
In terms of stages, VC investments in 2004 were
mainly focused on the expansion, growth, bridge/mezzanine/pre-IPO
and the early stages.
Figure 3: Investment by Stages
During 2004
| No. of investee
companies |
139
|
| Business stage |
US$m
|
% share
|
| Seed capital |
4.2
|
5.6
|
| Start-up
capital |
5.1
|
6.7
|
| Early stage |
12.9
|
16.9
|
| Expansion,
growth |
27.8
|
36.6
|
| Bridge,
mezzanine, pre-IPO |
17.7
|
23.2
|
| Management
buy-out |
5.1
|
6.6
|
| Cashing-out
(secondary purchase) |
0.2
|
0.2
|
| Other types
of investment |
3.2
|
4.2
|
| Total |
76.2
|
100
|
| Source:
Securities Commission |
In terms of investments by sector, the sectors
that received most of the VC investments were
the ICT sector, followed by the manufacturing
and life sciences sectors. However an apparent
or rather interesting development is the shift
in investment preference. The domestically sourced
VC investments were more focused on the ICT sector,
moving away from the manufacturing sector, while
the foreign VCs shifted their preference from
the ICT sector to the life sciences sector. This
apparent shift by both local and foreign VC's
are in line with the potential growth in these
areas coupled with the government's initiatives
for projects in these areas.
Figure 4: Investment by Sector
During 2004
| |
As at end 2004
|
| |
US$m
|
% share
|
| Information
and communications technology |
117.4
|
42.2
|
| Manufacturing |
70.8
|
25.5
|
| Life sciences |
51.2
|
18.4
|
| Education |
10.1
|
3.6
|
| Electricity,
power generation, gas and water |
4.6
|
1.6
|
| Wholesale,
retail trade, restaurant and hotels |
2.7
|
1.0
|
| Financing,
insurance, real estate and business services |
1.8
|
0.6
|
| Construction |
-
|
0.0
|
| Transport,
storage and communications |
-
|
0.0
|
| Others |
19.7
|
7.1
|
| Total |
278.3
|
100.0
|
| Source:
Securities Commission |
As of August 2005, a total of 89 venture-backed
companies were listed, of which 30% were on MESDAQ
while the remaining 70% were either on the Main
Board or Second Board. In 2004 itself, a total
of 14 venture-backed companies were listed, ten
of which were on MESDAQ, two on the Main Board
and two on the Second Board of Bursa Malaysia.
Amongst the IPOs in 2004 were Jobstreet Corporation
Berhad, MEMS Technology Berhad and Air Asia Berhad.
Challenges in the VC Industry
Undeniably, the venture capital industry landscape
in Malaysia has changed tremendously especially
with the emergence of new names on the local scene
such as the MAVCap and its four outsourcing partners.
Despite gaining increasing recognition as an
alternative source of funds for investment, the
industry faces several problems. This includes
limited sources of funds for VCC due mainly to
the high risk and long-term nature of their investment.
Moreover, comprehensive information on the industry
is not readily available. As a result, there is
a general lack of awareness and misconception
of the role of venture capital financing (VCs
like to take control of companies).
Also, entrepreneurs generally felt that there
is limited access to experts who can guide them
and their companies to the next level.
The industry also faced several situations where
VCs were unwilling to offer funding and of entrepreneurs
not understanding the business requirements of
venture capital investments. This concern is also
apparent in Europe and elsewhere. From 2003, there
have been fewer entrepreneurs venturing into business
due to declining appetite for risk as well as
VCs now looking for more solid business proposals.
Future of Venture Capital Industry in Malaysia
Amid the challenges faced by the VCC, several
measures have been introduced to promote the development
of VCCs. Amongst efforts carried out were the
tax incentives introduced in 1992, whereby the
VCCs are exempted from the payment of income tax
in respect of the statutory income on all sources
of income, other than interest income arising
from savings or fixed deposits and profits from
Shariah-based deposits.
In addition, losses incurred by VCCs arising
from disposal of shares were allowed to be set
off against aggregate income and total income.
The establishment of MVCA in 1995 to enhance
greater awareness of the industry, the launching
of MESDAQ in 1997 to provide an avenue for high
growth and technology companies to raise equity
capital as well as to promote the VC industry
by providing an exit mechanism for their investments
in such companies. The industry had also conducted
several education programmes to address the misconception
on VCs role.
The encouraging statistics recorded in 2004 reflects
a continued and consistent growth and the successes
of the VC industry are indicative of the demand
for VC funding. The impact of VC funding and benefits
to the Malaysian economy is immense and the VCs
in the industry look forward to working with entrepreneurs
to deliver greater success.
The development of VC in Malaysia will continue
to be keenly promoted in view of its significance
in nurturing new growths areas. Further efforts
will be directed towards greater capacity building
in terms of skills upgrading and access to private
sector financing. Constraints in the supply of
innovations would be addressed with the improvement
of deal flows through the development of a critical
mass of high growth-potential investees. In order
to assist the cultivation of better entrepreneurship
culture, efforts are being directed at providing
the necessary business and regulatory environment,
ensuring access to financing at the earlier stages
of innovation and reviewing existing policies
relating to the commercialisation of ideas.
|