Search
Eurekahedge - Other Products and Services
Fund Of Private Equity Fund Database Free Trial

Hedge Fund News

EH Report

Manager Interviews

‘Mizuho-Eurekahedge Index’ goes live

Asian Hedge Fund Awards

Industry Events Calendar

Fund Launches and Closures

Archive



Eurekahedge
Eurekahedge Hedge Fund Indices

Hedge Fund Monthly
 
The Depth of the Dive: Gauging the Scope and Scale of Due Diligence

Jason Scharfman, Managing Partner
Corgentum

June 2009
 

A depth gauge is a type of pressure gauge used by SCUBA divers to determine their equivalent depth in water. Divers utilise these gauges to, among other things, avoid such things as decompression sickness.

In the same way that the term due diligence does not have a universal meaning, particularly when applied to a hedge fund context, neither does the scope and comprehensiveness – the depth – of operational due diligence reviews.

In the post-Madoff environment it is no longer acceptable for a fund of hedge funds or any institution, which allocates to hedge funds, to simply claim that they have comprehensive investment and operational due diligence practices. These firms must be able to consistently demonstrate the depth and breadth of their due diligence.

Similarly, investors must be equipped to gauge the quality and effectiveness of this work. Below are some guidelines that both individual investors and professional hedge fund allocators can utilise in determining the scope and scale of their due diligence process.

A primary way in which due diligence methodologies vary is in terms of the type of risk factors weights vetted. As an example, within an operational due diligence context certain hedge fund investors will take care to review certain categories such as the insurance coverage of the hedge fund manager. Others will simply ignore these factors all together. Still other due diligence approaches gloss over these items with cursory reviews without understanding appropriate coverage levels for each manager.

On a related note, another consideration is the weight that each allocator puts on the importance of a particular factor, in this case adequacy of insurance coverage, in the overall operational decision and asset allocation process. In a perfect world, a risk-averse investor would likely prefer to understand these risks and weigh them accordingly rather than turning a blind eye and roll the dice.

Another way in which due diligence methodologies differ in scope is in terms of the number of factors covered. Continuing the insurance example, a due diligence process which does an extremely detailed job of vetting a hedge fund manager’s insurance coverage and nothing else certainly fails the scope test.

Unfortunately, there is no one universal standard as to how many factors should be covered. In practice, investors should gauge a due diligence process by not only the number of operational risk factors analysed but by the quality, hedge fund strategy relevance and its overall comprehensiveness as a function of the total potential operational risk in place at a hedge fund.

Certain hedge fund allocation organisations will have resources specifically dedicated to different aspects of due diligence (ie operational and investment). Others will dedicate less resources to due diligence and instead blend the roles of investment analysts with operational due diligence. In these cases, investors must ask themselves if the professional hedge fund allocator is dedicating sufficient resources to due diligence and properly vetting the full spectrum of increasingly complex operational risks, which accompany hedge fund investing.

 

 

Jason Scharfman is a managing partner at Corgentum, which provides operational risk consulting services to the alternative investment industry.

This article first appeared in www.finalternatives.com on 28 May 2009.



If you have any comments about or contributions to make to this newsletter, please email advisor@eurekahedge.com

[Top]




 
Industry News
 
     
  The Eurekahedge Report - July 2014  
     
  Asset Flows Update for the Month of June 2014  
     
  Hedge Fund Performance Commentary for the Month of June 2014  
     
  2014 Key Trends in Asian Hedge Funds  
     
  Interview with Wallace Lo, Fund Manager at Guoyuan Global Opportunities Fund  
     
  Hushmail: Are Activist Hedge Funds Breaking Bad?  
     
  Key Considerations When Launching A Fund on A Third-Party UCITS or AIFMD Compliant Platform  
     
  Thailand: An Opportunity for Islamic Finance?  
     
     
     
Eurekahedge Hedge Fund Manager Travel Plans

Copyright © 2014 Eurekahedge Pte Ltd.
Use of this site is subject to our terms and conditions of use.