The number of venture capital companies (VCC)
totalled six in 1990 and rose to 13 by 1992. The
number of VCC almost doubled to 23 by end of 1998,
but it was not until 1999, that the pace of venture
capital development significantly accelerated
with the launch of MSC Ventures, which was allocated
a fund of US$31 million.
In 2001, US$131 million was allocated to Malaysia Venture Capital Management for information and communication technology (ICT) investments and in 2002, US$20 million was allocated to MIMOS, a government-owned, research and development (R&D) organisation specialising in the areas of ICT and microelectronics, and US$50 million to Kumpulan Modal Perdana, a government-owned company to administer and manage the venture capital for Technology Acquisition Fund. In the 2003 Budget, a further US$260 million was announced for non-ICT investments.
Historically Malaysia's venture capital industry was dominated by local venture capital players and lagged behind developed countries like Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Korea. However, in the past two to three years, the emergence of independent venture capital firms in Malaysia marked another significant development in the market. In the past, a majority of the VCC were either government- or bank-owned and in almost all cases, have chosen to manage their own funds rather than outsourcing to professional fund management companies.
Current Developments
Further expansion was recorded in 2004, in terms of the total size of funds, total investments from both local and foreign sources, number of venture capital fund management companies and number of investee companies.
Figure 1: Key Statistics on the Venture Capital
Industry
As at end 2003 | As at end 2004 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Venture capital funds (US$m) | 557.4 | 596.3 | |
Total investment (US$m)* | 231.2 | 278.4 | |
Local sources (US$m) | 202.4 | 233.6 | |
Foreign sources (US$m) | 28.8 | 44.8 | |
No. of venture capital companies/funds | 43** | 38 | |
No. of venture capital fund management companies | 31 | 34 | |
No. of investee companies | 31 | 34 | |
During 2003 | During 2004 | ||
Total investment (US$m) | 59.9 | 76.2 | |
Local sources (US$m) | 50.7 | 65.4 | |
Foreign sources (US$m) | 9.2 | 10.8 | |
No. of investee companies | 115 | 139 | |
* Including divestment activities ** Based on Bank Negara Malaysia's definition | |||
Source: Securities Commission |
The government remains as the major source of provider of funds. The contribution of funds for VC investments coming from domestic private sector entities recorded a significant increase of 35.1% in 2004. Funds received from foreign sources have also increased substantially to US$44.8 million.
Figure 2: Sources of Venture
Capital
(% share, as at end 2004)
Total US$596.3 million
In terms of stages, VC investments in 2004 were mainly focused on the expansion, growth, bridge/mezzanine/pre-IPO and the early stages.
No. of investee companies |
139
|
|
---|---|---|
Business stage |
US$m
|
% share
|
Seed capital |
4.2
|
5.6
|
Start-up capital |
5.1
|
6.7
|
Early stage |
12.9
|
16.9
|
Expansion, growth |
27.8
|
36.6
|
Bridge, mezzanine, pre-IPO |
17.7
|
23.2
|
Management buy-out |
5.1
|
6.6
|
Cashing-out (secondary purchase) |
0.2
|
0.2
|
Other types of investment |
3.2
|
4.2
|
Total |
76.2
|
100
|
Source: Securities Commission |
In terms of investments by sector, the sectors
that received most of the VC investments were
the ICT sector, followed by the manufacturing
and life sciences sectors. However an apparent
or rather interesting development is the shift
in investment preference. The domestically sourced
VC investments were more focused on the ICT sector,
moving away from the manufacturing sector, while
the foreign VCs shifted their preference from
the ICT sector to the life sciences sector. This
apparent shift by both local and foreign VC's
are in line with the potential growth in these
areas coupled with the government's initiatives
for projects in these areas.
As at end 2004
|
||
---|---|---|
US$m
|
% share
|
|
Information and communications technology |
117.4
|
42.2
|
Manufacturing |
70.8
|
25.5
|
Life sciences |
51.2
|
18.4
|
Education |
10.1
|
3.6
|
Electricity, power generation, gas and water |
4.6
|
1.6
|
Wholesale, retail trade, restaurant and hotels |
2.7
|
1.0
|
Financing, insurance, real estate and business services |
1.8
|
0.6
|
Construction |
-
|
0.0
|
Transport, storage and communications |
-
|
0.0
|
Others |
19.7
|
7.1
|
Total |
278.3
|
100.0
|
Source: Securities Commission |
As of August 2005, a total of 89 venture-backed companies were listed, of which 30% were on MESDAQ while the remaining 70% were either on the Main Board or Second Board. In 2004 itself, a total of 14 venture-backed companies were listed, ten of which were on MESDAQ, two on the Main Board and two on the Second Board of Bursa Malaysia. Amongst the IPOs in 2004 were Jobstreet Corporation Berhad, MEMS Technology Berhad and Air Asia Berhad.
Challenges in the VC Industry
Undeniably, the venture capital industry landscape in Malaysia has changed tremendously especially with the emergence of new names on the local scene such as the MAVCap and its four outsourcing partners.
Despite gaining increasing recognition as an alternative source of funds for investment, the industry faces several problems. This includes limited sources of funds for VCC due mainly to the high risk and long-term nature of their investment. Moreover, comprehensive information on the industry is not readily available. As a result, there is a general lack of awareness and misconception of the role of venture capital financing (VCs like to take control of companies).
Also, entrepreneurs generally felt that there is limited access to experts who can guide them and their companies to the next level.
The industry also faced several situations where VCs were unwilling to offer funding and of entrepreneurs not understanding the business requirements of venture capital investments. This concern is also apparent in Europe and elsewhere. From 2003, there have been fewer entrepreneurs venturing into business due to declining appetite for risk as well as VCs now looking for more solid business proposals.
Future of Venture Capital Industry in Malaysia
Amid the challenges faced by the VCC, several measures have been introduced to promote the development of VCCs. Amongst efforts carried out were the tax incentives introduced in 1992, whereby the VCCs are exempted from the payment of income tax in respect of the statutory income on all sources of income, other than interest income arising from savings or fixed deposits and profits from Shariah-based deposits.
In addition, losses incurred by VCCs arising from disposal of shares were allowed to be set off against aggregate income and total income.
The establishment of MVCA in 1995 to enhance greater awareness of the industry, the launching of MESDAQ in 1997 to provide an avenue for high growth and technology companies to raise equity capital as well as to promote the VC industry by providing an exit mechanism for their investments in such companies. The industry had also conducted several education programmes to address the misconception on VCs role.
The encouraging statistics recorded in 2004 reflects a continued and consistent growth and the successes of the VC industry are indicative of the demand for VC funding. The impact of VC funding and benefits to the Malaysian economy is immense and the VCs in the industry look forward to working with entrepreneurs to deliver greater success.
The development of VC in Malaysia will continue
to be keenly promoted in view of its significance
in nurturing new growths areas. Further efforts
will be directed towards greater capacity building
in terms of skills upgrading and access to private
sector financing. Constraints in the supply of
innovations would be addressed with the improvement
of deal flows through the development of a critical
mass of high growth-potential investees. In order
to assist the cultivation of better entrepreneurship
culture, efforts are being directed at providing
the necessary business and regulatory environment,
ensuring access to financing at the earlier stages
of innovation and reviewing existing policies
relating to the commercialisation of ideas.